Now Reading: The Power of the ‘Won’t Have’ Category in MoSCoW Prioritization Framework
-
01
The Power of the ‘Won’t Have’ Category in MoSCoW Prioritization Framework
The Power of the ‘Won’t Have’ Category in MoSCoW Prioritization Framework
In the world of project management, we often focus on what we will build. But just as important—if not more so—is what we choose not to build. Within the MoSCoW framework, the “Won’t Have” category is far more than a simple discard pile; it is a strategic shield for your project, a clear signal of your focus, and a powerful tool for managing expectations.
More Than Just a "No"
The “Won’t Have” category represents a conscious decision. It’s a list of features or requirements that are explicitly out of scope for the current phase. This isn’t just about rejecting an idea; it’s about acknowledging a valid request and strategically deferring it. It tells stakeholders, “This is a great idea, but to deliver our core value on time, we will not be including it in this release.”
A Shield Against Scope Creep
Scope creep—the uncontrolled growth of a project’s scope—is a common pitfall that can lead to missed deadlines and budget overruns. The “Won’t Have” category is your first line of defense. By clearly defining what is out of scope, you create a boundary that makes it easy to say no to new requests and keeps your team focused on what truly matters.
Fostering Innovation and Focus
When a team is bogged down with a seemingly endless list of “Must Have” features, innovation often takes a backseat. By strategically moving non-essential items to the “Won’t Have” category, you free up valuable time and resources. This allows your team to focus their creative energy on the features that truly matter—the core experience that will define your product’s success. It encourages a mindset of minimalism and a commitment to quality over quantity.
Communicating with Clarity
One of the most powerful aspects of the “Won’t Have” list is its ability to manage stakeholder expectations. When a stakeholder’s request is visibly placed on this list, it communicates that their idea has been heard and considered, even if it won’t be implemented immediately. This transparency builds trust and prevents future frustration. It turns a potential conflict into a shared understanding of project priorities and a strategic roadmap for the future. By documenting these decisions, teams can refer back to the reasoning behind their choices, preventing misunderstandings and keeping everyone aligned.
How to Use It Effectively
Be Proactive: Don’t wait for a request to be rejected. Start your prioritization process with a discussion about what should be on the “Won’t Have” list to set a clear baseline for the project.
Be Specific: Instead of a vague “no,” provide a clear reason for why a feature is a “Won’t Have.” Is it a technical challenge, a lack of resources, or simply out of alignment with the current vision?
Keep it Visible: Ensure the “Won’t Have” list is just as visible as the “Must Have” list. It should be a public, shared document that everyone can access and reference.
Review Regularly: As the project evolves, revisit the “Won’t Have” list. What was not important a month ago might become a “Should Have” or “Could Have” later on.